IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Hagness Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 26 9 6 15 0.577 0.1113 0.1113 0.2640 0.2640
2021-22 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 24 7 10 17 0.708 0.1366 0.1366 0.3241 0.3241
2022-23 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 24 3 9 12 0.500 0.0732 0.0754 0.2452 0.2527
2023-24 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 37 17 20 37 1.000 0.1463 0.1434 0.4903 0.4805
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 10 1 0 1 0.100
2024-25 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC — 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21850
Forward overall
#1159
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Talon Medure
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Tobias
Nazareth · 2021-22
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Gamache
Hobart · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.