IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Hagness Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 26 9 6 15 0.577 0.1160 0.1160 0.2638 0.2638
2021-22 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 24 7 10 17 0.708 0.1424 0.1424 0.3239 0.3239
2022-23 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 24 3 9 12 0.500 0.1155 0.1190 0.2446 0.2520
2023-24 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 37 17 20 37 1.000 0.2310 0.2264 0.4892 0.4794
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 10 1 0 1 0.100
2024-25 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC — 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22499
Forward overall
#1199
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Zeleznikar
Concordia · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Talon Medure
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Gamache
Hobart · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.