IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Bechard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 39 7 12 19 0.487 0.0381 0.0413 0.1100 0.1192
2016-17 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 39 27 45 72 1.846 0.1444 0.1471 0.4169 0.4246
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 50 22 23 45 0.900 0.1931 0.1984 0.4407 0.4528
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 45 18 23 41 0.911 0.1955 0.1911 0.4462 0.4361
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Alvernia D3 MAC — 21 2 3 5 0.238
2021-22 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 17 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22429
Forward overall
#890
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Zaleski
Becker · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Webb
Suffolk · 2021-22
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Williams
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.