IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Amedeo Mastrangeli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-10-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Milton Menace OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 52 4 5 9 0.173 0.0484 0.0502 0.1195 0.1238
2018-19 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 54 5 32 37 0.685 0.1914 0.1890 0.4729 0.4669
2019-20 — OJHL 54 8 43 51 0.944 0.2639 0.2639 0.6517 0.6517
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 29 3 16 19 0.655
2022-23 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 26 1 20 21 0.808
2021-22 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 27 2 22 24 0.889
2020-21 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 15 2 10 12 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2020-21 · Elmira
+534.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4501
Defenseman overall
#841
Defenseman born in 1999
#1633
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Nate Repensky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Yale (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Frost
Castleton · 2009-10
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Marzec
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Stroh
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.