← New Search ↗ Social Card

Amedeo Mastrangeli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-10-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Milton Menace OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 52 4 5 9 0.173 0.0424 0.0439 0.1192 0.1235
2018-19 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 54 5 32 37 0.685 0.1679 0.1658 0.4718 0.4659
2019-20 OJHL 54 8 43 51 0.944 0.2315 0.2315 0.6502 0.6502
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 29 3 16 19 0.655
2022-23 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 26 1 20 21 0.808
2021-22 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 27 2 22 24 0.889
2020-21 Elmira D1 UCHC FR 15 2 10 12 0.800
2020-21 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 15 2 10 12 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2020-21 · Elmira
+624.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6527
Defenseman overall
#1418
Defenseman born in 1999
#1339
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roger Williams · 2023-24
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2009-10
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.