IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Stroh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-11-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Estevan Bruins SJHL 54 12 14 26 0.481 0.1391 0.1477 0.3625 0.3848
2007-08 Estevan Bruins SJHL 58 30 26 56 0.966 0.2789 0.2816 0.7268 0.7338
2008-09 Estevan Bruins SJHL 45 23 19 42 0.933 0.2696 0.2587 0.7026 0.6743
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 29 19 22 41 1.414
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 31 11 18 29 0.935
2010-11 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 28 11 9 20 0.714
2009-10 St. Norbert D3 — FR 27 8 5 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2009-10 · St. Norbert
+110.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15343
Forward overall
#668
Forward born in 1988
#317
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Dubicki
Tufts · 2021-22
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ludvig Steenberg
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Pisarczyk
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.