IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ludvig Steenberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-12-06 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 40 13 39 52 1.300 0.2790 0.2717 0.6366 0.6199
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 28 5 8 13 0.464
2017-18 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 26 7 16 23 0.885
2016-17 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 26 6 13 19 0.731
2015-16 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 27 3 11 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2015-16 · Plymouth State
+122.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12093
Forward overall
#499
Forward born in 1994
#43
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Steuck
Saint Mary's · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dalton Carter
Utica · 2013-14
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Drevitch
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.