IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bennett Lawrick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 45 1 9 10 0.222 0.0545 0.0587 0.1530 0.1649
2017-18 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 50 4 13 17 0.340 0.0833 0.0858 0.2341 0.2410
2018-19 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 53 6 15 21 0.396 0.0971 0.0952 0.2728 0.2675
2019-20 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 50 12 18 30 0.600 0.1471 0.1471 0.4131 0.4131
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Williams D3 NESCAC SR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2022-23 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 27 1 3 4 0.148
2021-22 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 23 3 3 6 0.261
2020-21 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11558
Defenseman overall
#2099
Defenseman born in 1999
#2359
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryder Nienhuis
Adrian · 2022-23
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Porter Haney
Gustavus Adolphus · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brock MacDonald
Elmira · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.