IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Rehbaum Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — NCDC 46 20 22 42 0.913 0.3722 0.3842 0.7306 0.7542
2019-20 Northern Cyclones NCDC 48 25 27 52 1.083 0.4417 0.4417 0.8669 0.8669
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 27 4 11 15 0.556
2022-23 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 21 3 0 3 0.143
2021-22 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 20 1 6 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2021-22 · SUNY Geneseo
+6.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3946
Forward overall
#161
Forward born in 2000
#24
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Ray Pigozzi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Hawkins
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
Daniel Milne
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christian Heil
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Mazzetti
Elmira · 2000-01
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Christen
St. Norbert · 2019-20
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Conger
UMass Boston · 2015-16
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.