← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Christen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tomah/Sparta (Wis.) USHS-MN 2 1 2 3 1.500 0.1848 0.1848 0.3644 0.3644
2021-22 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 37 1 6 7 0.189 0.0672 0.0704 0.1986 0.2081
2022-23 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 56 4 10 14 0.250 0.0888 0.0887 0.2625 0.2622
2023-24 NAHL 59 7 13 20 0.339 0.1204 0.1145 0.3559 0.3385
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA 31 6 16 22 0.710
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA 30 4 11 15 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2024-25 · St. Norbert
+408.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15526
Defenseman overall
#2893
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2014-15
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2000-01
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.