← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nico Gonzalez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 47 11 22 33 0.702 0.1721 0.1750 0.4834 0.4917
2014-15 OJHL 54 11 16 27 0.500 0.1226 0.1184 0.3443 0.3324
2015-16 OJHL 55 14 22 36 0.654 0.1604 0.1460 0.4506 0.4101
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Cortland D1 JR 13 2 1 3 0.231
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 13 2 1 3 0.231
2017-18 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 13 2 1 3 0.231
2016-17 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 21 4 7 11 0.524
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2016-17 · SUNY Cortland
+353.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30779
Forward overall
#1223
Forward born in 1995
#1641
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Olaf · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.