IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Rhodes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 61 13 23 36 0.590 0.1280 0.1291 0.4521 0.4561
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 47 8 24 32 0.681 0.2776 0.2715 0.5449 0.5329
2019-20 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 41 11 35 46 1.122 0.4574 0.4574 0.8978 0.8978
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 26 6 4 10 0.385
2022-23 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 25 2 5 7 0.280
2021-22 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 22 5 2 7 0.318
2020-21 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6328
Forward overall
#269
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeffrey Gratz
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Arvega Hovsepyan
Salve Regina · 2022-23
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Taje
Lake Forest · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.