IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David McIntyre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-02-04 Country: Canada
2006 · Round 5, Pick #138  ·  Dallas Stars Dallas Stars
Signed Professionally
Kölner Haie · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Milton Menace OJHL 46 17 14 31 0.674 0.1652 0.1698 0.4640 0.4769
2005-06 Milton Menace OJHL 46 42 50 92 2.000 0.4902 0.4858 1.3770 1.3646
2014-15 SaiPa Liiga 48 12 20 32 0.667 1.6667 1.5417 5.7310 5.3011
2015-16 SaiPa Liiga 58 16 40 56 0.966 2.4138 2.1311 8.2995 7.3275
2021-22 SaiPa Liiga 37 4 9 13 0.351 0.8785 0.4651 3.0207 1.5992
2022-23 Kölner Haie DEL 56 21 17 38 0.679 1.6965 1.0878 5.7533 3.6889
2023-24 Kölner Haie DEL 48 7 11 18 0.375 0.9375 0.5530 3.1793 1.8755
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 35 11 28 39 1.114
2008-09 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 37 21 22 43 1.162
2007-08 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 39 15 17 32 0.821
2006-07 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 40 9 8 17 0.425
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2006-07 · Colgate
+38.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3762
Forward overall
#137
Forward born in 1987

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Coffman
Utica · 2023-24
1.480 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Melso
SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Schultz
St. Norbert · 2001-02
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.