← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Zanette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 North York Rangers OJHL 48 16 13 29 0.604 0.1481 0.1609 0.4160 0.4520
2005-06 North York Rangers OJHL 48 30 21 51 1.062 0.2604 0.2733 0.7315 0.7679
2006-07 Aurora Tigers OJHL 33 23 29 52 1.576 0.3862 0.3861 1.0849 1.0845
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Niagara D1 AHA SR 35 29 26 55 1.571
2009-10 Niagara D1 AHA JR 36 11 10 21 0.583
2008-09 Niagara D1 AHA SO 23 6 4 10 0.435
2007-08 Niagara D1 AHA FR 34 7 12 19 0.559
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2007-08 · Niagara
+91.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11651
Forward overall
#461
Forward born in 1988
#254
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2012-13
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2016-17
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.