| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | North York Rangers | OJHL | 48 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 0.604 | 0.1481 | 0.1609 | 0.4160 | 0.4520 |
| 2005-06 | North York Rangers | OJHL | 48 | 30 | 21 | 51 | 1.062 | 0.2604 | 0.2733 | 0.7315 | 0.7679 |
| 2006-07 | Aurora Tigers | OJHL | 33 | 23 | 29 | 52 | 1.576 | 0.3862 | 0.3861 | 1.0849 | 1.0845 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Niagara | D1 | AHA | SR | 35 | 29 | 26 | 55 | 1.571 |
| 2009-10 | Niagara | D1 | AHA | JR | 36 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 0.583 |
| 2008-09 | Niagara | D1 | AHA | SO | 23 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.435 |
| 2007-08 | Niagara | D1 | AHA | FR | 34 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 0.559 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.