IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Tait Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 41 7 14 21 0.512 0.2088 0.2357 0.4117 0.4648
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 39 13 17 30 0.769 0.3136 0.3362 0.6183 0.6628
2019-20 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 35 17 17 34 0.971 0.3960 0.3960 0.7808 0.7808
2020-21 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 40 12 19 31 0.775 0.3160 0.3160 0.6229 0.6229
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast GR 16 10 6 16 1.000
2023-24 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 29 18 20 38 1.310
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 28 14 15 29 1.036
2021-22 University of New England D3 CNE — 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5517
Forward overall
#220
Forward born in 2001
#86
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Evan Allen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Drew Melanson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Motte
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Gamez
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Jackson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shawn Kennedy
Elmira · 2016-17
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Wagner
Bethel · 2017-18
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Ruffin
Adrian · 2016-17
1.276 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.