← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Tait Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 41 7 14 21 0.512 0.1184 0.1337 0.4142 0.4677
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 39 13 17 30 0.769 0.1778 0.1906 0.6220 0.6668
2019-20 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 35 17 17 34 0.971 0.2245 0.2245 0.7855 0.7855
2020-21 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 40 12 19 31 0.775 0.1791 0.1791 0.6267 0.6267
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast GR 16 10 6 16 1.000
2023-24 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 29 18 20 38 1.310
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 28 14 15 29 1.036
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2022-23 · Plymouth State
+620.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
92%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6357
Forward overall
#248
Forward born in 2001
#93
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2016-17
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2016-17
1.276 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.