| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 44 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 0.432 | 0.1232 | 0.1366 | 0.3343 | 0.3707 |
| 2016-17 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 58 | 14 | 20 | 34 | 0.586 | 0.1673 | 0.1767 | 0.4538 | 0.4794 |
| 2017-18 | — | CCHL | 30 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 0.600 | 0.1712 | 0.1720 | 0.4645 | 0.4667 |
| 2018-19 | Aberdeen Wings | NAHL | 58 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 0.586 | 0.2177 | 0.2132 | 0.6207 | 0.6080 |
| 2019-20 | Amarillo Wranglers | NAHL | 52 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 0.500 | 0.1857 | 0.1857 | 0.5294 | 0.5294 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | SR | 28 | 13 | 26 | 39 | 1.393 |
| 2022-23 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | JR | 19 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.737 |
| 2021-22 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | SO | 26 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 1.115 |
| 2020-21 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | FR | 15 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 1.133 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.