| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | King Rebellion | OJHL | 49 | 24 | 41 | 65 | 1.327 | 0.3251 | 0.3407 | 0.9133 | 0.9571 |
| 2007-08 | King Rebellion | OJHL | 49 | 32 | 55 | 87 | 1.776 | 0.4352 | 0.4364 | 1.2224 | 1.2257 |
| 2015-16 | Starbulls Rosenheim | DEL2 | 46 | 21 | 20 | 41 | 0.891 | 1.1940 | 1.3177 | 1.5993 | 1.7649 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | UMass Lowell | D1 | HockeyEast | SR | 38 | 10 | 19 | 29 | 0.763 |
| 2010-11 | UMass Lowell | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 34 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 0.912 |
| 2009-10 | UMass Lowell | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 39 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 0.692 |
| 2008-09 | UMass Lowell | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 38 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 0.711 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.