IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Crimmins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-10-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 35 1 13 14 0.400 0.0369 0.0371 0.0916 0.0920
2018-19 Express Hockey Club EHL 24 2 0 2 0.083 0.0192 0.0196 0.0408 0.0418
2019-20 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 43 3 4 7 0.163 0.0213 0.0213 0.0553 0.0553
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 11 0 2 2 0.182
2022-23 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26213
Defenseman overall
#3542
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Brophy
Trinity · 2023-24
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Hines
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.130 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Schammel
Gustavus Adolphus · 2009-10
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.