IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Kashark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 37 12 18 30 0.811 0.1061 0.1128 0.2752 0.2925
2022-23 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 38 13 15 28 0.737 0.0964 0.0977 0.2501 0.2535
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 42 40 39 79 1.881 0.2460 0.2375 0.6384 0.6163
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 20 3 2 5 0.250
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 15 3 3 6 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2024-25 · UMass Dartmouth
+157.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8356
Forward overall
#336
Forward born in 2003
#313
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Russo
Elmira · 2018-19
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Oye
Fredonia · 2006-07
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Fransky
Elmira · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.