IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Thombs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 University School of Milwaukee (Wis.) USHS-MN 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.0844 0.0844 0.1619 0.1619
2022-23 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 50 6 11 17 0.340 0.0833 0.0829 0.2341 0.2330
2023-24 Pueblo Bulls NCDC 51 12 18 30 0.588 0.2398 0.2325 0.4728 0.4585
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 23 4 4 8 0.348
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 20 0 2 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2024-25 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
-32.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21021
Forward overall
#1098
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase LeClerc
Endicott · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Meo
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Lafleur
Johnson & Wales · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.