IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Thombs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 University School of Milwaukee (Wis.) USHS-MN 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.0821 0.0821 0.1619 0.1619
2022-23 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 50 6 11 17 0.340 0.0833 0.0829 0.2327 0.2316
2023-24 Pueblo Bulls NCDC 51 12 18 30 0.588 0.1359 0.1318 0.4756 0.4612
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 23 4 4 8 0.348
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 20 0 2 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2024-25 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
4.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23041
Forward overall
#1243
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnny Meo
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor McBride
St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Friesen
Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.