IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Swaim Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-11-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Rivers School NE-Prep 26 0 2 2 0.077 0.0148 0.0148 0.0352 0.0352
2021-22 Rivers School NE-Prep 22 5 4 9 0.409 0.0789 0.0789 0.1872 0.1872
2022-23 Rivers School NE-Prep 23 0 2 2 0.087 0.0168 0.0168 0.0398 0.0398
2023-24 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 36 0 2 2 0.056 0.0128 0.0130 0.0450 0.0458
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colby D3 NESCAC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Colby D3 NESCAC — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26389
Defenseman overall
#4157
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Christian Baldino
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Hackett
Post · 2015-16
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Daly
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2018-19
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.