IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sammy Mielock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — NCDC 41 12 9 21 0.512 0.1184 0.1211 — —
2024-25 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 40 15 21 36 0.900 0.2080 0.2035 0.7277 0.7120
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Davenport University ACHA_D1 — — 12 7 5 12 1.000
2025-26 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 6 0 2 2 0.333
2024-25 Davenport University ACHA_D1 — — 12 7 5 12 1.000
2023-24 Davenport University ACHA_D1 — — 12 7 5 12 1.000
2022-23 Davenport University ACHA_D1 — — 12 7 5 12 1.000
2021-22 Davenport University ACHA_D1 — — 12 7 5 12 1.000
2020-21 Davenport University ACHA_D1 — — 12 7 5 12 1.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
5%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8220
Forward overall
#305
Forward born in 2004
#163
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Frost
Castleton · 2010-11
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jory Mullin
Neumann · 2012-13
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.