IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Joffe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 52 6 9 15 0.288 0.0707 0.0746 0.1986 0.2095
2016-17 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 53 25 27 52 0.981 0.2405 0.2429 0.6755 0.6824
2017-18 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 53 32 35 67 1.264 0.3099 0.2981 0.8704 0.8374
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 RIT D1 AHA SR 34 5 4 9 0.265
2020-21 RIT D1 AHA JR 20 5 4 9 0.450
2019-20 RIT D1 AHA SO 24 7 2 9 0.375
2018-19 RIT D1 AHA FR 24 1 2 3 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2018-19 · RIT
-47.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17470
Forward overall
#826
Forward born in 1998
#621
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Peters
UMass Boston · 2016-17
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2016-17
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Duszynski
Norwich · 2008-09
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.