← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mel Melconian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-21 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Western Ontario · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Aurora Tigers OJHL 51 29 30 59 1.157 0.2836 0.2932 0.7965 0.8236
2019-20 Univ. of Windsor USports-M 17 2 5 7 0.412 0.2173 0.2173 1.2070 1.2070
2020-21 Univ. of Windsor USports-M 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Univ. of Windsor USports-M 13 5 2 7 0.538 0.2841 0.2845 1.5783 1.5803
2022-23 Univ. of Western Ontario USports-M 8 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 6 0 1 1 0.167
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 18 2 2 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2017-18 · Sacred Heart
-11.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17550
Forward overall
#831
Forward born in 1998

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2016-17
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.