← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luc Reeve Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 6 4 10 0.208 0.0511 0.0562 0.1434 0.1576
2019-20 OJHL 50 15 21 36 0.720 0.1765 0.1765 0.4957 0.4957
2020-21 Aurora Tigers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Aurora Tigers OJHL 43 20 32 52 1.209 0.2964 0.2826 0.8326 0.7938
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 28 21 21 42 1.500
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 28 21 21 42 1.500
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 28 21 21 42 1.500
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 28 21 21 42 1.500
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 28 21 21 42 1.500
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 28 21 21 42 1.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.50
2020-21 · Ohio University
+3018.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21708
Forward overall
#1172
Forward born in 2002
#904
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2015-16
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2024-25
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.