← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Richard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Burlington Cougars OJHL 50 7 12 19 0.380 0.0931 0.0931 0.2616 0.2616
2020-21 Burlington Cougars OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Burlington Cougars OJHL 46 35 26 61 1.326 0.3250 0.3245 0.9130 0.9115
2022-23 Burlington Cougars OJHL 52 53 35 88 1.692 0.4148 0.3929 1.1651 1.1037
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 12 2 1 3 0.250
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Niagara D1 AHA 34 10 11 21 0.618
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2023-24 · Niagara
+97.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10125
Forward overall
#487
Forward born in 2002
#175
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2024-25
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.