| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | — | NTDP-U18 | 40 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.225 | 0.1672 | 0.1624 | 0.8396 | 0.8156 |
| 2006-07 | Saginaw Spirit | OHL | 46 | 17 | 19 | 36 | 0.783 | 0.4527 | 0.4491 | 2.0109 | 1.9949 |
| 2007-08 | — | OHL | 67 | 15 | 31 | 46 | 0.687 | 0.3972 | 0.3744 | 1.7642 | 1.6631 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.