icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Brockville Braves | CCHL | 56 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 0.286 | 0.0620 | 0.0673 | 0.2210 | 0.2398 |
| 2013-14 | Kemptville 73's | CCHL | 50 | 31 | 20 | 51 | 1.020 | 0.2212 | 0.2290 | 0.7892 | 0.8170 |
| 2014-15 | Kemptville 73's | CCHL | 47 | 30 | 39 | 69 | 1.468 | 0.3184 | 0.3149 | 1.1359 | 1.1235 |
| 2023-24 | Sport | Liiga | 12 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.583 | 1.4583 | 1.3243 | 5.0141 | 4.5534 |
| 2024-25 | Löwen Frankfurt | DEL | 32 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.250 | 0.6250 | 0.6103 | 2.1195 | 2.0697 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | RIT | D1 | AHA | SR | 37 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 0.784 |
| 2017-18 | RIT | D1 | AHA | JR | 37 | 29 | 13 | 42 | 1.135 |
| 2016-17 | RIT | D1 | AHA | SO | 37 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 0.730 |
| 2015-16 | RIT | D1 | AHA | FR | 37 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.460 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.