← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jerry D'Amigo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-02-19 Country: USA
2009 · Round 5, Pick #158  ·  Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Maple Leafs
Signed Professionally
Löwen Frankfurt · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 64 11 17 28 0.438 0.3252 0.3313 1.6325 1.6632
2008-09 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 53 23 33 56 1.057 0.7854 0.7580 3.9426 3.8050
2010-11 Kitchener Rangers OHL 21 12 16 28 1.333 0.7713 0.7240 3.4259 3.2160
2016-17 Ilves Liiga 48 13 20 33 0.688 1.7188 1.7729 5.9098 6.0957
2017-18 KalPa Liiga 38 6 11 17 0.447 1.1185 1.0768 3.8459 3.7023
2018-19 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 52 18 25 43 0.827 2.0673 2.1750 7.0106 7.3760
2019-20 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 41 9 13 22 0.537 1.3415 1.3415 4.5494 4.5494
2021-22 Düsseldorfer EG DEL 46 7 12 19 0.413 1.0325 0.9010 3.5015 3.0555
2022-23 Löwen Frankfurt DEL 38 4 10 14 0.368 0.9210 0.7766 3.1234 2.6338
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 RPI D1 ECAC FR 35 10 24 34 0.971
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.55
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2009-10 · RPI
+77.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6916
Forward overall
#293
Forward born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2022-23
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.