Owen Lalonde Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-02-01 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2016-17	Sudbury Wolves	OHL	64	2	10	12	0.188	0.1085	0.1175	0.4818	0.5216
2017-18	Guelph Storm	OHL	67	1	21	22	0.328	0.1900	0.1960	0.8438	0.8707
2018-19	Guelph Storm	OHL	68	7	34	41	0.603	0.3488	0.3434	1.5492	1.5253
2019-20	—	OHL	57	2	23	25	0.439	0.2537	0.2537	1.1270	1.1270
2021-22	Queen's Univ.	USports-M	19	5	16	21	1.105	0.5832	0.6213	3.2396	3.4513
2022-23	Queen's Univ.	USports-M	22	2	12	14	0.636	0.3358	0.3407	1.8653	1.8924
2023-24	Queen's Univ.	USports-M	28	6	15	21	0.750	0.3957	0.3805	2.1982	2.1139
2024-25	Queen's Univ.	USports-M	26	2	23	25	0.962	0.5073	0.4635	2.8182	2.5749

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2025-26	Miami	D1	NCHC	—	9	0	2	2	0.222

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.41

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.22

2025-26 · Miami

-45.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

98%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1479

Defenseman overall

#311

Defenseman born in 2000

D2/3 Comparables

Rihards Marenis

Aurora · 2013-14

1.000 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Zach Dill

Salem State · 2021-22

1.111 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Lucas Signoretti

Buffalo State · 2023-24

1.120 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.