← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Seed Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0639 0.0744 0.1548 0.1803
2018-19 Owen Sound Attack OHL 60 2 8 10 0.167 0.0967 0.1060 0.4272 0.4682
2019-20 Owen Sound Attack OHL 54 1 6 7 0.130 0.0752 0.0752 0.3321 0.3321
2020-21 Owen Sound Attack OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Owen Sound Attack OHL 39 4 8 12 0.308 0.1786 0.1679 0.7885 0.7413
2022-23 Owen Sound Attack OHL 65 6 27 33 0.508 0.2946 0.2642 1.3010 1.1669
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 CCHA JR 30 3 19 22 0.733
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2025-26 · Lindenwood
+244.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6200
Defenseman overall
#1544
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.