IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Seed Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-24 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Carleton Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0434 0.0506 0.1547 0.1802
2018-19 Owen Sound Attack OHL 60 2 8 10 0.167 0.0964 0.1056 0.4283 0.4694
2019-20 Owen Sound Attack OHL 54 1 6 7 0.130 0.0750 0.0750 0.3330 0.3330
2020-21 Owen Sound Attack OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Owen Sound Attack OHL 39 4 8 12 0.308 0.1780 0.1674 0.7906 0.7433
2022-23 Owen Sound Attack OHL 65 6 27 33 0.508 0.2937 0.2634 1.3045 1.1701
2023-24 Carleton Univ. USports-M 28 4 13 17 0.607 0.3203 0.3437 1.7794 1.9092
2024-25 Carleton Univ. USports-M 25 5 16 21 0.840 0.4432 0.4543 2.4620 2.5234
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 CCHA JR 30 3 19 22 0.733
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2025-26 · Lindenwood
+89.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2007
Defenseman overall
#493
Defenseman born in 2002

D2/3 Comparables

Rihards Marenis
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Dill
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sascha Figi
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.