IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Bisson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-10-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 — USPHL-Premier 35 6 19 25 0.714 0.0934 0.0939 0.2424 0.2436
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 1 1 0.091

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10641
Defenseman overall
#2260
Defenseman born in 2003
#3202
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robb Haider
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Johnson
Nichols · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Revniaga
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.