← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Caroline Thomas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-01 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.37
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.4261
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.85
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.9919
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

18%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
82%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 19U-AAA-W 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.2737 0.2737
2024-25 New Hampton NE-Prep-Girls 32 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Middlebury NESCAC FR 24 17 9 26 1.083

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Liz Schepers USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG 0.410 Ohio State
Paige Voight USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG 0.559 Merrimack
Amy Petersen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG 0.784 Penn State
Mariah Gardner USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG 0.071 Minnesota State
Emily Gunderson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG 0.171 Lindenwood

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Kaiya Sandy 2024-25 · 1.27 PPG 0.571 Hamline MIAC
Presleigh Giesbrecht 2021-22 · 0.72 PPG 1.000 Post CHA-W
Devin Leary 2007-08 · 1.44 PPG 0.500 Utica UCHC
Molly Murphy 2024-25 · 1.23 PPG 0.583 Framingham State MASCAC
Jillian Tabaka 2021-22 · 1.38 PPG 0.518 Concordia (WI) NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.