← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Mikayla Mrzywka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-25 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.18
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2045
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.41
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.4767
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
88%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Syracuse Valley Eagles 16U 16U-AAA-W 52 26 15 41 0.788 0.2532 0.2463
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Western New England CNE FR 25 8 4 12 0.480

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Sophia Kunin USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG 0.425 Wisconsin
Taylor Williamson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG 0.395 Minnesota
Emily Gunderson USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.64 PPG 0.171 Lindenwood
Andrea Renner USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG 0.167 Northeastern
Brooke Madsen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG 0.600 Penn State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Josie Grossman 2023-24 · 1.46 PPG 0.400 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Addison Moos 2023-24 · 0.86 PPG 0.680 Concordia MIAC
Jamie Henderson 2011-12 · 1.96 PPG 0.320 Saint Mary's (MN) MIAC
Sadie Baker 2013-14 · 1.09 PPG 0.538 Hamline MIAC
Bailey Vesper 2023-24 · 1.70 PPG 0.393 Saint Benedict MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.