← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Mikayla Mrzywka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-25 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.19
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2166
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.43
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5056
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
88%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Syracuse Valley Eagles 16U 16U-AAA-W 52 26 15 41 0.788 0.2508 0.2439
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Western New England CNE FR 25 8 4 12 0.480

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Sophia Kunin USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG 0.425 Wisconsin
Sierra Alarid USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.93 PPG 0.188 Post
Andrea Renner USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG 0.167 Northeastern
Brooke Madsen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG 0.600 Penn State
Lydia Passolt USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG 0.095 Bemidji State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Josie Grossman 2023-24 · 1.46 PPG 0.400 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Addison Moos 2023-24 · 0.86 PPG 0.680 Concordia MIAC
Jamie Henderson 2011-12 · 1.96 PPG 0.320 Saint Mary's (MN) MIAC
Sadie Baker 2013-14 · 1.09 PPG 0.538 Hamline MIAC
Zoe Cramer 2024-25 · 1.60 PPG — Mercyhurst AHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.