Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Northern Alberta Xtreme U18 | CSSHL-U18W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2021-22 | Northern Alberta Xtreme U18 | CSSHL-U18W | 27 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.407 | 0.0933 | 0.0933 |
| 2022-23 | Northern Alberta Xtreme U18 | CSSHL-U18W | 27 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 0.370 | 0.0849 | 0.0800 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Manhattanville | UCHC | JR | 26 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.385 |
| 2024-25 | Manhattanville | UCHC | SO | 24 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.417 |
| 2023-24 | Manhattanville | UCHC | FR | 20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.100 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Boyle | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG | 0.486 | Ohio State |
| Brittney Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG | 0.571 | St. Cloud State |
| Kate Rydland | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG | 0.161 | Penn State |
| Mckenzie Revering | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG | 0.059 | Minnesota Duluth |
| McKenna Wesloh | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG | 0.273 | Ohio State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lizzy Hamel | 2023-24 · 0.85 PPG | 0.316 | Colby | NESCAC |
| Jenna Abeyta | 2016-17 · 0.29 PPG | 0.829 | Post | CHA-W |
| Darby Marshall | 2025-26 · 0.43 PPG | 0.577 | Curry | CNE |
| Ella Hornung | 2024-25 · 0.71 PPG | 0.333 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Emilie Anderson | 2023-24 · 1.00 PPG | 0.235 | St. Olaf | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.