Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Newark Ironbound 19U AAA | 19U-AAA-W | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2022-23 | Newark Ironbound 19U AAA | 19U-AAA-W | 76 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.210 | 0.0670 | 0.0702 |
| 2023-24 | Newark Ironbound 19U AAA | 19U-AAA-W | 18 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 0.444 | 0.1415 | 0.1391 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Trinity | NESCAC | SO | 25 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 0.280 |
| 2024-25 | Trinity | NESCAC | FR | 17 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.294 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carly Bullock | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG | 0.812 | Princeton |
| Emily Antony | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG | 0.444 | Minnesota State |
| Vilma Tanskanen | SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.182 | North Dakota |
| Lydia Passolt | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG | 0.095 | Bemidji State |
| Amanda Bäckebo | SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG | 0.056 | Syracuse |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abby Skelly | 2024-25 · 0.93 PPG | 0.360 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC |
| Addison Seleski | 2024-25 · 1.04 PPG | 0.323 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Afton Hulke | 2023-24 · 1.11 PPG | 0.308 | Bethel | MIAC |
| McKenna Sandberg | 2022-23 · 1.23 PPG | 0.280 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Rachel Azuma | 2014-15 · 1.40 PPG | 0.231 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.