← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Avery Sinclair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.07
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0768
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.18
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1881
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

10%
NCAA D1W
12%
NCAA D3W
78%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 Fort Frances High CAHS-W 15 3 4 7 0.467 0.1675 0.1675
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Beloit WIAC FR 23 0 2 2 0.087

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota
Lauren Boyle USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG 0.486 Ohio State
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Mekenzie Steffen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.350 Wisconsin

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Greer Hardacre 2023-24 · 1.48 PPG 0.286 Saint Benedict MIAC
Ellin Rees 2023-24 · 0.80 PPG 0.536 Norwich LittleEast
Daelyn Williams 2024-25 · 0.80 PPG 0.545 Salem State MASCAC
Drew Kopek 2022-23 · 1.04 PPG 0.417 SUNY Cortland SUNYAC
Kristina Press 2016-17 · 0.64 PPG 0.667 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.