Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Minnetonka High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.067 | 0.0101 | 0.0101 |
| 2018-19 | Minnetonka High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.125 | 0.0189 | 0.0189 |
| 2019-20 | Minnetonka High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 0.480 | 0.0725 | 0.0725 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | St. Norbert | NCHA | FR | 12 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.833 |
| 2023-24 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | SR | 25 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 0.720 |
| 2022-23 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | JR | 25 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.400 |
| 2021-22 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | SO | 21 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.381 |
| 2020-21 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | FR | 16 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.875 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hannah Schultz | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG | 0.267 | Union |
| Anna Erickson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG | 0.030 | Vermont |
| Katarina Seper | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG | 0.050 | RPI |
| Paige Sorensen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG | 0.529 | Merrimack |
| McKenzie Sederberg | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG | 0.125 | Minnesota State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leah Elledge | 2012-13 · 1.44 PPG | 0.032 | Lindenwood | CHA-W |
| Talia Stein Trujillo | 2024-25 · 0.29 PPG | 0.167 | Suffolk | CNE |
| Hannah Graunke | 2022-23 · 0.23 PPG | 0.179 | St. Norbert | NCHA |
| Anna Elizarkov | 2024-25 · 0.30 PPG | 0.148 | Southern Maine | LittleEast |
| Kristi Peters | 2013-14 · 0.42 PPG | 0.125 | Manhattanville | UCHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.