← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Addison Mach Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-23 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.02
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0256
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.06
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.0619
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

0%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
100%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 27 3 2 5 0.185 0.0280 0.0256
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2024-25 St. Scholastica NCHA FR 18 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Curry NEHC FR 18 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Serena Sommerfield NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG 0.000 Boston College
McKenzie Sederberg USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG 0.125 Minnesota State
Katarina Seper USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG 0.050 RPI
Katie Carlson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG 0.000 RIT
Xylia Lang USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG 0.091 Lindenwood

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Veera Marjomaa 2024-25 · 0.16 PPG Hood College UCHC
Sydney Wang 2024-25 · 0.15 PPG Wisconsin-Stevens Point WIAC
Olivia Robbins 2023-24 · 0.14 PPG 0.417 Plymouth State LittleEast
Anna Tude 2010-11 · 0.29 PPG 0.214 Elmira UCHC
Lucie Velinská 2023-24 · 0.18 PPG 0.375 Neumann MAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.