← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Danielle Bos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.09
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0999
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.21
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2278
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2016-17 Monsignor Martin USHS-W 20 1 3 4 0.200 0.0170 0.0170
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2019-20 Chatham UCHC SO 25 2 8 10 0.400
2018-19 Chatham UCHC FR 25 3 2 5 0.200

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Hannah Schultz USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG 0.267 Union
Anna Erickson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG 0.030 Vermont
Paige Sorensen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG 0.529 Merrimack
Katarina Seper USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG 0.050 RPI
McKenzie Sederberg USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG 0.125 Minnesota State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Leah Elledge 2012-13 · 1.44 PPG 0.032 Lindenwood CHA-W
Talia Stein Trujillo 2024-25 · 0.29 PPG 0.167 Suffolk CNE
Hannah Graunke 2022-23 · 0.23 PPG 0.179 St. Norbert NCHA
Kristi Peters 2013-14 · 0.42 PPG 0.125 Manhattanville UCHC
Anna Elizarkov 2024-25 · 0.30 PPG 0.148 Southern Maine LittleEast

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.