Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Madison Metro High | USHS-W | 22 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 1.000 | 0.0849 | 0.0849 |
| 2021-22 | Culver Military Academy | NE-Prep-Girls | 45 | 5 | 17 | 22 | 0.489 | 0.1588 | 0.1507 |
| 2022-23 | — | 19U-AAA-W | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.125 | 0.0513 | 0.0513 |
| 2023-24 | — | 19U-AAA-W | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.250 | 0.1026 | 0.1026 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Union | ECAC-W | SO | 19 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.105 |
| 2024-25 | Union | ECAC-W | FR | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Briana Jorde | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG | 0.077 | Bemidji State |
| Cheyenne Harris | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG | 0.324 | Union |
| Taylor Turnquist | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG | 0.171 | Clarkson |
| Amanda Kimmerle | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.059 | RPI |
| Megan Hinze | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.182 | Minnesota State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tallulah Bryant | 2022-23 · 1.00 PPG | 0.273 | Lake Forest | NCHA |
| Charlotte Bellmont | 2024-25 · 0.69 PPG | — | Saint Benedict | MIAC |
| Anna Rausch | 2024-25 · 0.86 PPG | 0.312 | St. Norbert | NCHA |
| Allie LeClaire | 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG | 0.333 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Dani Weiland | 2024-25 · 0.96 PPG | 0.300 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.