← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Emma Lintner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-12-15 Country: Austria
NCAA-W Projection
Vermont
Verbal HEA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.21
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2502
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.55
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.6382
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
8%
NCAA D3W
80%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 57 12 20 32 0.561 0.2014 0.2114
2025-26 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 42 20 12 32 0.762 0.2734 0.2760
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Liz Schepers USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG 0.410 Ohio State
Paige Voight USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG 0.559 Merrimack
Mariah Gardner USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG 0.071 Minnesota State
Emily Gunderson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG 0.171 Lindenwood
Lindsay Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG 0.027 UConn

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Molly Pohlkamp 2022-23 · 0.78 PPG 0.920 Wisconsin-Stevens Point WIAC
Annalee Holzer 2023-24 · 1.37 PPG 0.500 St. Norbert NCHA
Samantha Bogen 2022-23 · 1.81 PPG 0.400 St. Catherine MIAC
Annika Mielke 2022-23 · 1.31 PPG 0.524 Augsburg MIAC
Natalie Meeder 2023-24 · 0.70 PPG 0.960 Dubuque NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.