← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Greyce Kennedy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-20 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
Norwich
Verbal LittleEast D3W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.19
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2218
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.49
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5780
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
18%
NCAA D3W
70%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2025-26 Rothesay Netherwood School JWHL-U19 14 1 7 8 0.571 0.2218 0.2218
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Aly Tremblay USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG 0.030 RPI
Danielle Marmer 19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG 0.108 Quinnipiac
Jacqueline Kaasa USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG 0.143 Bemidji State
Nicole Guagliardo USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG 0.156 Mercyhurst
Lindsay Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG 0.027 UConn

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Grace Karakas 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG 0.417 SUNY Cortland SUNYAC
Abigail Chamernick 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG 0.500 Hamline MIAC
Emily Heid 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG 0.593 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Makenna Kadrlik 2021-22 · 1.54 PPG 0.375 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Payton Rudiger 2013-14 · 1.33 PPG 0.435 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.