Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Fargo North/South High | USHS-W | 24 | 28 | 21 | 49 | 2.042 | 0.1733 | 0.1742 |
| 2020-21 | Fargo North/South High | USHS-W | 21 | 30 | 13 | 43 | 2.048 | 0.1738 | 0.1738 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | St. Cloud State | WCHA-W | FR | 34 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.294 |
| 2023-24 | St. Thomas | CHA-W | JR | 36 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0.222 |
| 2022-23 | St. Thomas | CHA-W | SO | 36 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.139 |
| 2021-22 | St. Thomas | CHA-W | FR | 33 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.394 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gabbie Hughes | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG | 1.121 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Andrea Renner | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG | 0.167 | Northeastern |
| Liz Schepers | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG | 0.410 | Ohio State |
| Paige Beebe | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.12 PPG | 0.472 | Bemidji State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hannah Grabianowski | 2023-24 · 0.92 PPG | 0.517 | St. Norbert | NCHA |
| Josie Grossman | 2022-23 · 1.19 PPG | 0.400 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Ella Konrad | 2023-24 · 0.70 PPG | 0.700 | Nazareth | UCHC |
| Lauren VanStone | 2013-14 · 2.73 PPG | 0.160 | Neumann | UCHC |
| Kaiya Sandy | 2022-23 · 0.90 PPG | 0.571 | Hamline | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.