Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Mississauga Hurricanes U22 | OWHL-U22 | 29 | 21 | 11 | 32 | 1.103 | 0.3864 | 0.3864 |
| 2022-23 | Mississauga Hurricanes U22 | OWHL-U22 | 42 | 46 | 36 | 82 | 1.952 | 0.6837 | 0.6837 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Quinnipiac | ECAC-W | JR | 41 | 42 | 22 | 64 | 1.561 |
| 2024-25 | Quinnipiac | ECAC-W | SO | 38 | 14 | 19 | 33 | 0.868 |
| 2023-24 | Quinnipiac | ECAC-W | FR | 37 | 11 | 23 | 34 | 0.919 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shayna Tomlinson | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG | 0.531 | Rensselaer |
| Jessie Aney | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG | 0.267 | UConn |
| Brooke Avery | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG | 0.062 | New Hampshire |
| Nicole Schammel | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG | 0.611 | Minnesota State |
| Caitrin Lonergan | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG | 0.892 | Boston College |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Mings | 2016-17 · 2.55 PPG | 0.964 | William Smith | NEHC |
| Julia Masotta | 2016-17 · 2.00 PPG | 1.222 | Norwich | NEHC |
| Alex Hantge | 2017-18 · 1.72 PPG | 1.417 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Abigail Stow | 2014-15 · 2.50 PPG | 0.963 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Callie Hoff | 2015-16 · 1.80 PPG | 1.321 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.