Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.429 | 0.0982 | 0.0982 |
| 2021-22 | RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 26 | 12 | 22 | 34 | 1.308 | 0.2996 | 0.2996 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Ohio State | WCHA-W | SR | 33 | 8 | 19 | 27 | 0.818 |
| 2024-25 | Ohio State | WCHA-W | JR | 37 | 1 | 11 | 12 | 0.324 |
| 2023-24 | Clarkson | ECAC-W | SO | 38 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.263 |
| 2022-23 | Clarkson | ECAC-W | FR | 40 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.225 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Kilponen | SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG | 0.257 | North Dakota |
| Anna Wright | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG | 0.000 | Maine |
| Briana Mastel | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG | 0.258 | Harvard |
| Taylor Marchin | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG | 0.207 | Yale |
| Erin O'Connor | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.85 PPG | 0.758 | Cornell |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carley Daly | 2017-18 · 1.37 PPG | 0.704 | Amherst | NESCAC |
| Jenna Hoops | 2017-18 · 1.19 PPG | 0.808 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Alex Hantge | 2015-16 · 0.68 PPG | 1.417 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Nina Thorson | 2021-22 · 1.04 PPG | 0.929 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Gabriella Heuser | 2024-25 · 2.50 PPG | 0.385 | Milwaukee School of Engineering | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.