Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | SDE HF | SDHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2021-22 | SDE HF | SDHL | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2022-23 | Djurgårdens IF | SDHL | 27 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.148 | 0.1732 | 0.1732 |
| 2023-24 | Djurgårdens IF | SDHL | 25 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.200 | 0.2339 | 0.2339 |
| 2024-25 | Djurgårdens IF | SDHL | 27 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.148 | 0.1732 | 0.1732 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Minnesota Duluth | WCHA-W | FR | 31 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.032 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grace Bizal | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG | 0.268 | Boston College |
| Kendra Nealey | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG | 0.212 | Cornell |
| Kate Hallett | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.100 | Harvard |
| Katie Robinson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.129 | Minnesota |
| Lauren Boyle | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG | 0.486 | Ohio State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alyson Vogelsang | 2023-24 · 0.81 PPG | — | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Lauren Schmidt | 2024-25 · 1.00 PPG | 0.333 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Adrienne Hansen | 2023-24 · 0.70 PPG | 0.481 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Jana Lesch | 2023-24 · 1.44 PPG | 0.222 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Ella Hansen | 2023-24 · 0.65 PPG | 0.500 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.