Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Orono High | USHS-MN-W | 28 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.500 | 0.0755 | 0.0840 |
| 2022-23 | Orono High | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 21 | 26 | 47 | 1.567 | 0.2366 | 0.2519 |
| 2023-24 | — | 16U-AAA-W | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.750 | 0.2663 | 0.2663 |
| 2024-25 | — | 16U-AAA-W | 10 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 1.600 | 0.5682 | 0.5682 |
| 2025-26 | — | 19U-AAA-W | 7 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.429 | 0.1759 | 0.1759 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | Wisconsin | WCHA-W | FR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gabbie Hughes | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG | 1.121 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Natalie Snodgrass | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG | 1.000 | UConn |
| Kaylee Druk | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG | 0.000 | Syracuse |
| Tianna Gunderson | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.20 PPG | 0.069 | Minnesota |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avery Engbrecht | 2023-24 · 1.27 PPG | 0.370 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC |
| Kylie Scott | 2022-23 · 1.04 PPG | 0.440 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Olivia Martin | 2024-25 · 0.92 PPG | 0.500 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Gracyn Schipper | 2024-25 · 1.38 PPG | 0.333 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Lexi Holman | 2011-12 · 1.44 PPG | 0.321 | Concordia (WI) | NCHA |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.