← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Natasha Rachlin

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: Unknown
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.07
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0778
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.02
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.0215
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2007-08 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 28 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2008-09 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 28 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2009-10 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 25 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2010-11 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 1 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2011-12 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 0 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2012-13 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 28 1 0 1 0.040 0.0184 0.0184
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2016-17 Harvard ECAC-W SR 29 0 4 4 0.138
2015-16 Harvard ECAC-W JR 32 0 2 2 0.062
2014-15 Harvard ECAC-W SO 16 0 2 2 0.125
2013-14 Harvard ECAC-W FR 34 1 2 3 0.088

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Caroline Buckholtz NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG 0.000 Brown
Hannah Schultz USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG 0.267 Union
Anna Erickson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG 0.030 Vermont
Paige Sorensen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG 0.529 Merrimack
Katarina Seper USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG 0.050 RPI

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.