Union
Set Commitment
NCAA Division I Women's
Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.07
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0767
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1
NCAA D3W
Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.24
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2771
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1
D1W / D3W Likelihood
0%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
95%
Club / Other
Based on 40 comparable players
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG
Pre-College Seasons
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Kingston Jr. Ice Wolves | OWHL-U22 | 45 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.222 | 0.0778 | 0.0767 |
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow
Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mallorie Iozzo | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG | 0.069 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Sierra Semmel | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG | 0.000 | Maine |
| Rose Rather | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.824 | Holy Cross |
| Liz Trautz | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.094 | Colgate |
| Rebecca Lindblad | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.057 | UConn |
Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Mehta | 2022-23 · 0.42 PPG | 0.654 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Skyler Arneson | 2022-23 · 0.70 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC |
| Lizzy Hamel | 2023-24 · 0.85 PPG | 0.316 | Colby | NESCAC |
| Sydney Mintz | 2022-23 · 0.38 PPG | 0.750 | Utica | UCHC |
| Anna Daniels | 2010-11 · 0.32 PPG | 0.870 | Castleton | NEHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.