← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Charlotte Dukovac Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-28 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
Providence
Verbal HEA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.15
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1715
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.39
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.4536
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

20%
NCAA D1W
20%
NCAA D3W
60%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 16U-AAA-W 29 0 3 3 0.103 0.0369 0.0369
2025-26 19U-AAA-W 22 4 10 14 0.636 0.2612 0.2612
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Mariah Gardner USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG 0.071 Minnesota State
Amy Petersen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG 0.784 Penn State
Emily Gunderson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG 0.171 Lindenwood
Paige Voight USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG 0.559 Merrimack
Charly Dalhquist USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG 0.241 North Dakota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Alexandra Kleckner 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG 0.500 Saint Benedict MIAC
Kallie Tibbetts 2018-19 · 1.72 PPG Saint Mary's (MN) MIAC
Erin Olson 2016-17 · 1.08 PPG 0.640 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Sierra Alarid 2012-13 · 3.69 PPG 0.188 Post CHA-W
Maddie Kolbow 2014-15 · 1.08 PPG 0.633 Hamline MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.