← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phil DeSimone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-03-19 Country: USA
2007 · Round 3, Pick #84  ·  Washington Capitals Washington Capitals
Signed Professionally
Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 44 2 7 9 0.204 0.1206 0.1273 0.6142 0.6483
2005-06 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 60 15 38 53 0.883 0.5211 0.5227 2.6529 2.6612
2006-07 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 60 26 47 73 1.217 0.7177 0.6831 3.6542 3.4779
2013-14 Jokerit Liiga 8 1 2 3 0.375 0.9375 0.9504 3.2235 3.2678
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 39 10 31 41 1.051
2009-10 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 39 10 27 37 0.949
2008-09 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 38 7 11 18 0.474
2007-08 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 38 3 10 13 0.342
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.58
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2007-08 · New Hampshire
-40.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1069
Forward overall
#37
Forward born in 1987

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.