| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 44 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.204 | 0.1206 | 0.1273 | 0.6142 | 0.6483 |
| 2005-06 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 60 | 15 | 38 | 53 | 0.883 | 0.5211 | 0.5227 | 2.6529 | 2.6612 |
| 2006-07 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 60 | 26 | 47 | 73 | 1.217 | 0.7177 | 0.6831 | 3.6542 | 3.4779 |
| 2013-14 | Jokerit | Liiga | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.375 | 0.9375 | 0.9504 | 3.2235 | 3.2678 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | SR | 39 | 10 | 31 | 41 | 1.051 |
| 2009-10 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 39 | 10 | 27 | 37 | 0.949 |
| 2008-09 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 38 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 0.474 |
| 2007-08 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 38 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.342 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.